NeuroGenetics
← All ModulesDashboardReview
NeuroGenetics Curriculum·advanced·30 min

Genetic Neuromuscular Disorders

A genetics-focused guide to hereditary neuromuscular disorders — spanning the muscular dystrophies, spinal muscular atrophy, congenital myopathies, inherited neuropathies, and channelopathies. Emphasizes molecular diagnosis, genotype-phenotype correlations, and the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape.

Tags: Neurogenetics · Advanced

Learning Objectives

  1. 1.Classify neuromuscular disorders by level of involvement (anterior horn, motor nerve, NMJ, muscle) and recognize characteristic clinical patterns
  2. 2.Explain the genetic basis of Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy and apply the reading-frame rule to predict phenotype
  3. 3.Diagnose and manage spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with awareness of gene therapy and approved treatments
  4. 4.Recognize the major congenital myopathies and their causative genes
  5. 5.Apply the diagnostic approach to inherited neuropathy (Charcot-Marie-Tooth) and identify key genes

01Classification and Clinical Approach to Neuromuscular Disease

Neuromuscular disorders are divided by the anatomical level of involvement: anterior horn cell (lower motor neuron), peripheral nerve (motor/sensory), neuromuscular junction (NMJ), or muscle. The clinical pattern — proximal vs. distal weakness, presence of sensory involvement, reflexes, cardiac involvement, family history — guides localization and genetic differential. Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) are essential for localization before genetic testing.

Key Points

  • Proximal > distal weakness without sensory loss: suggests myopathy or anterior horn disease (SMA); elevated CK points to myopathy
  • Distal > proximal weakness with sensory loss: peripheral neuropathy (CMT); decreased/absent reflexes; nerve conduction shows demyelinating or axonal pattern
  • NMJ disorder (myasthenia gravis, congenital myasthenic syndrome): fatigable weakness, ptosis, diplopia; EMG shows decremental response on repetitive nerve stimulation
  • CK level: massively elevated (>10× ULN) in muscular dystrophies (DMD, LGMD); mildly elevated in congenital myopathies; normal in neuropathies and anterior horn cell disease
  • Muscle biopsy: essential in many congenital myopathies (nemaline rods, central cores, fiber type disproportion); immunohistochemistry for dystrophin, sarcoglycans, caveolin guides genetic testing. For an overview of testing strategies and expected yields, see the [[diagnostic-yields|Diagnostic Yields]] module

02Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) are allelic X-linked recessive disorders caused by variants in the DMD gene (Xp21.2), encoding dystrophin — the largest gene in the human genome. Dystrophin links the intracellular actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix via the dystrophin-associated protein complex (DAPC). Loss of dystrophin leads to membrane fragility, calcium influx, oxidative stress, and progressive muscle fiber necrosis and replacement by fat and connective tissue.

Key Points

  • Reading-frame rule: DMD variants that disrupt the translational reading frame (frameshift deletions, nonsense variants) → no functional dystrophin → DMD phenotype; in-frame deletions allow production of truncated but partially functional dystrophin → BMD (milder)
  • Deletions (65–70% of cases): multi-exon deletions detected by MLPA or aCGH; reading frame predicts DMD vs. BMD with ~90% accuracy — exons 51, 45, and 53 skipping are therapeutic targets
  • DMD natural history: onset age 3–5 with proximal weakness, Gowers sign, calf pseudohypertrophy; loss of ambulation ~12 years; cardiomyopathy universal by age 18; respiratory failure without intervention
  • Approved therapies: exon 51 skipping (eteplirsen — FDA 2016, AO-mediated, small benefit), exon 53 skipping (golodirsen — FDA 2019; viltolarsen — FDA 2020), exon 45 skipping (casimersen — FDA 2021), stop codon readthrough (ataluren for nonsense variants — EU approved), gene therapy (delandistrogene moxeparvovec/Elevidys — approved FDA 2023 for 4–5 year olds)
  • Carrier females: CK often elevated; cardiomyopathy risk in ~10%; cardiac screening recommended; manifesting carriers with significant weakness possible due to skewed X-inactivation

03Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) has historically been the second most common fatal autosomal recessive disorder in children (after cystic fibrosis), though mortality has decreased dramatically with the advent of disease-modifying therapies (nusinersen, risdiplam, onasemnogene abeparvovec). It is caused by loss of survival motor neuron protein (SMN) due to homozygous deletion of the SMN1 gene on 5q13. SMN is essential for snRNP biogenesis and pre-mRNA splicing in motor neurons. The SMN2 gene, a nearly identical paralog on the same chromosome, produces only ~10–15% full-length SMN due to alternative splicing at exon 7 — the copy number of SMN2 is the major modifier of phenotype severity.

Key Points

  • SMN1 deletion (exon 7+8): detected by MLPA or quantitative PCR; ~95% of patients have homozygous SMN1 exon 7 deletion; ~5% are compound heterozygous with a deletion on one allele and a point variant on the other
  • SMA types: Type 0 (prenatal onset, severe congenital hypotonia, death <6mo); Type 1 (Werdnig-Hoffmann, onset <6mo, never sits, death <2yr without treatment); Type 2 (onset 6–18mo, sits but never stands); Type 3 (Kugelberg-Welander, onset >18mo, achieves walking); Type 4 (adult onset, mild)
  • SMN2 copy number as modifier: 1–2 copies → Type 1; 3 copies → Type 2/3; 4+ copies → Type 3/4; higher SMN2 copy number associated with milder phenotype
  • Nusinersen (Spinraza): antisense oligonucleotide administered intrathecally; modifies SMN2 splicing to include exon 7, increasing full-length SMN; approved 2016; first disease-modifying SMA therapy
  • Risdiplam (Evrysdi): oral small-molecule SMN2 splicing modifier; promotes exon 7 inclusion in SMN2 mRNA, increasing full-length SMN protein; approved FDA 2020 for patients ≥2 months; advantage of oral administration and CNS + peripheral tissue distribution
  • Onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma): AAV9-SMN1 gene replacement; single IV infusion; approved 2019 for children <2 years (US); most effective when given presymptomatically via newborn screening; also approved intrathecally for older/heavier patients in some countries. For detailed coverage of gene therapy and ASO mechanisms, see the [[therapies|Gene and Molecular Therapies]] module

04Congenital Myopathies and Muscular Dystrophies

Congenital myopathies are a heterogeneous group of genetic muscle disorders defined primarily by structural abnormalities on muscle biopsy rather than by dystrophic changes. They typically present at birth or in infancy with hypotonia, weakness, and respiratory insufficiency. The major genetic muscular dystrophies beyond DMD/BMD include the limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMD), Emery-Dreifuss MD, and facioscapulohumeral MD (FSHD).

Key Points

  • Nemaline myopathy (NEB, ACTA1, TPM2/3, TNNT1): nemaline rods on Gomori trichrome biopsy; NEB-related forms often severe; ACTA1 point variants more variable; respiratory and feeding difficulties predominate
  • Central core disease (RYR1, dominant or recessive): central cores on oxidative stain; associated with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (RYR1); myopathy relatively static; cores spare periphery of fiber
  • FSHD (facioscapulohumeral MD): facial, scapular, and distal leg weakness; contraction of D4Z4 repeats on 4q35 (FSHD1) or SMCHD1 methylation defect (FSHD2) → aberrant DUX4 expression; AD, reduced penetrance
  • Emery-Dreifuss MD (LMNA, EMD/emerin): early joint contractures (elbows, ankles, spine) + slowly progressive humeroperoneal weakness + cardiac conduction disease → sudden death risk; LMNA also causes dilated cardiomyopathy with minimal muscle disease — annual cardiac screening/ICD
  • LGMD classification (2018 ENMC): >30 recognized subtypes including AD (LGMD-D) and AR (LGMD-R) forms; most common: LGMD-R1 (calpain-3/CAPN3), LGMD-R2 (dysferlin/DYSF, elevated CK), LGMD-R3-6 (sarcoglycanopathies), LGMD-R9 (anoctamin-5/ANO5)

05Hereditary Neuropathies and Channelopathies

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is the most common hereditary neuromuscular disorder, with a prevalence of ~1/2,500. It is genetically heterogeneous, with over 100 causative genes. The hereditary channelopathies (periodic paralysis, myotonia, paramyotonia) are autosomal dominant ion channel disorders causing episodic muscle weakness or stiffness. Together with congenital myasthenic syndromes, they round out the spectrum of hereditary neuromuscular disease.

Key Points

  • CMT1A: PMP22 duplication on 17p12 (detected by MLPA) — most common CMT (~40%); demyelinating; uniform slowing of NCVs (MCV <38 m/s in median nerve); onset in childhood with high arches, hammertoes, distal weakness
  • CMT1X: GJB1 (connexin-32) mutations; X-linked dominant; males more severely affected; intermediate NCV pattern; CNS involvement (T2 white matter changes) in some males
  • CMT2A: MFN2 mutations; axonal CMT; onset in first two decades; severe disability common; length-dependent axonal degeneration; MFN2 encodes mitofusin 2 essential for mitochondrial dynamics
  • Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DMPK CTG repeat): most common adult MD; multisystem: myotonia, progressive weakness (facial, distal, respiratory), cataracts, cardiac conduction, endocrine, cognitive; anticipation; DMPK CUG repeats sequester MBNL1 → RNA splicing dysregulation
  • Periodic paralysis: hypokalemic (CACNA1S or SCN4A — AD; attacks triggered by carbohydrate/rest after exercise; treat: acetazolamide, avoid triggers), hyperkalemic/normokalemic (SCN4A — AD; treat: mexiletine, thiazide diuretics); myotonia congenita (CLCN1 — muscle chloride channel; Thomsen AD, Becker AR; improves with exercise — 'warm-up' phenomenon). For pharmacogenomic considerations in neuromuscular disease (e.g., malignant hyperthermia with RYR1), see the [[pharmacogenetics|Pharmacogenetics]] module

Quiz Questions

1. A 9-month-old infant presents with progressive hypotonia, feeding difficulty, macroglossia, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. CK is mildly elevated. Acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA) enzyme activity is markedly reduced on dried blood spot. The most likely diagnosis and initial management are:

  1. A.Infantile-onset Pompe disease (GAA deficiency) — initiate enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with alglucosidase alfa as early as possible to slow cardiac and motor decline✓
  2. B.Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 — start nusinersen intrathecally
  3. C.Duchenne muscular dystrophy — start corticosteroids and refer for exon-skipping therapy
  4. D.Myotonic dystrophy type 1 — supportive care only; no disease-modifying therapy available

This presentation — infantile-onset hypotonia, macroglossia, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and markedly reduced acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA) activity — is classic for infantile-onset Pompe disease (glycogen storage disease type II). Pompe disease is caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in the GAA gene, leading to lysosomal glycogen accumulation in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with alglucosidase alfa (Myozyme) or avalglucosidase alfa (Nexviazyme) should be initiated as early as possible, as cardiac and motor outcomes are significantly better with early treatment. Cross-reactive immunologic material (CRIM) status should be assessed to guide immunomodulation.

2. A 4-year-old boy has difficulty rising from the floor (Gowers sign), pseudohypertrophy of calves, and CK of 25,000 U/L. MLPA shows deletion of DMD exons 48–50. Applying the reading-frame rule, the predicted phenotype is:

  1. A.Becker muscular dystrophy — the deletion is in-frame and produces truncated dystrophin
  2. B.Duchenne muscular dystrophy — the deletion is out-of-frame and abolishes dystrophin production✓
  3. C.Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy — DMD exon deletions do not cause Duchenne phenotype
  4. D.Carrier female manifestation — DMD only affects females with complete deletion

The reading-frame rule predicts that deletions disrupting the translational reading frame cause DMD (no functional dystrophin), while in-frame deletions cause BMD (truncated but partially functional dystrophin). Deletion of exons 48–50 shifts the reading frame, predicting a DMD phenotype. This patient's presentation (Gowers sign, pseudohypertrophy, CK 25,000) is entirely consistent. Notably, exon 51 skipping therapy would convert this to an in-frame deletion (removing exon 51 makes the exon 47–52 junction in-frame), potentially converting to BMD-like disease.

3. A newborn is identified on expanded NBS with absent SMN1 exon 7 copy number. She is currently asymptomatic. The parents ask about prognosis and treatment. The most accurate statement is:

  1. A.Presymptomatic treatment with gene replacement or antisense therapy before motor neuron loss significantly improves outcomes compared to post-symptomatic treatment✓
  2. B.SMA is not treatable; only supportive care and genetic counseling should be offered
  3. C.Treatment should be delayed until the child shows clinical weakness to confirm the diagnosis
  4. D.Only children with SMN2 copy number ≥4 benefit from disease-modifying treatment

Multiple clinical trials demonstrate that presymptomatic treatment of SMA — initiated before motor neuron loss occurs — yields dramatically better outcomes than post-symptomatic treatment. Children treated presymptomatically with onasemnogene abeparvovec or nusinersen often achieve nearly normal motor milestones. This is the primary rationale for newborn screening for SMA. All children with biallelic SMN1 deletion, regardless of SMN2 copy number, should be offered treatment promptly.

4. A patient with Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (LMNA mutation) has developed early elbow and ankle contractures but has only mild limb weakness. The most important surveillance recommendation is:

  1. A.Annual pulmonary function tests due to high risk of respiratory failure
  2. B.Annual ophthalmologic exam for cataracts and ptosis
  3. C.Annual cardiac evaluation including ECG and echocardiogram due to high risk of cardiac conduction disease and sudden death✓
  4. D.Annual renal function tests due to secondary renal involvement

The most serious complication of Emery-Dreifuss MD (especially LMNA-related) is cardiac involvement — progressive conduction disease, complete heart block, and dilated cardiomyopathy — which can cause sudden death even when muscular weakness is mild. Annual cardiac surveillance with ECG, Holter monitoring, and echocardiography is essential. Pacemaker implantation is often required for conduction disease, and ICD for those with reduced ejection fraction. This cardiac risk applies even to female carriers of LMNA variants.

5. A 30-year-old woman with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is pregnant. She asks about risks to the baby. Her CTG repeat size in DMPK is 800 repeats. The most important genetic counseling point is:

  1. A.The child's risk of inheriting DM1 is 25% because myotonic dystrophy follows autosomal recessive inheritance
  2. B.The CTG repeat is stable during transmission and will not change size in the offspring
  3. C.DM1 does not affect neonates; the earliest onset is in adolescence regardless of repeat size
  4. D.There is a 50% risk of transmission, and maternal transmission of large expansions carries a significant risk of congenital myotonic dystrophy — a severe neonatal form with hypotonia, respiratory failure, and intellectual disability✓

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 follows autosomal dominant inheritance (50% transmission risk). A critical counseling point is that large CTG expansions (>800 repeats) transmitted maternally carry a high risk of congenital myotonic dystrophy (CDM) — a severe neonatal form characterized by profound hypotonia, respiratory failure requiring ventilation, feeding difficulty, and later intellectual disability. Anticipation is prominent: repeat size tends to increase across generations, particularly with maternal transmission of large expansions. The mother's repeat size of 800 places her offspring at substantial risk for CDM. Prenatal or preimplantation genetic testing can be offered.

6. A 6-year-old boy with SMA type 2 (3 copies of SMN2) has been on nusinersen for 2 years with stabilization of motor function. His parents ask about switching to oral risdiplam. Which statement best describes the mechanism and practical difference between these two therapies?

  1. A.Nusinersen is a gene replacement therapy while risdiplam is a splicing modifier — they have completely different targets
  2. B.Risdiplam directly increases SMN1 transcription, bypassing the need for SMN2 modification
  3. C.Both modify SMN2 splicing to promote exon 7 inclusion, but nusinersen is an antisense oligonucleotide requiring intrathecal injection while risdiplam is an oral small molecule with systemic distribution✓
  4. D.Nusinersen works only in the CNS, so switching to risdiplam would provide no benefit since motor neurons are the primary target

Both nusinersen and risdiplam promote exon 7 inclusion in SMN2 mRNA, increasing production of full-length SMN protein. Nusinersen is an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) that binds a specific intronic splicing silencer (ISS-N1) in the SMN2 pre-mRNA and requires intrathecal administration (every 4 months after loading doses), limiting distribution to the CNS. Risdiplam is an oral small molecule that modifies SMN2 splicing systemically, reaching both CNS and peripheral tissues. The practical advantages of risdiplam include oral dosing and systemic distribution; however, direct comparison trial data are limited, and switching decisions should consider individual patient response and clinical context.

NeuroGenetics Curriculum · neurogenetics-curriculum.vercel.app